... I rather deal with some YAHOO in India who knows his stuff (and, given a
bit of language patience, they do) than a usually totally ignorant fool from
Washington, DC (hey, might as well use that place, it fits beautifully; I
just don't want to call it American, figure it out yourself). So much for
maligning fine people in some other country that you don't seem to
understand.

"Gregory Forster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: I had to add my two cents.
:
: Being so huge and monopolistic isn't so bothersome.
: What bothers me is that they charge an exhorbitant
: price for products that JUST DON'T WORK!!!!!!!
:
: Example:  Windows 95 had FOUR DIFFERENT RELEASES!!
: Microsoft insists that their first release of programs
: do not have bugs.  Then, when they issue a newer
: version, even though everyone knows it's just a bug
: fix, Microsoft does not call them bug fixes, rather
: "software enhancements."  It's bad enough that they
: charge you such outragious prices "for permission to
: use their software."  Then, after a rediculous
: "warranty"  they charge you again an outragious price
: for "extended support."
:
: It always frosted me that if you wanted help with
: Windows for your brand new computer you just bought at
: K-Mart, you weren't allowed to contact Microsoft.  You
: had to contact "where you bought your computer." Well,
: never mind K-Mart. So you call the computer
: manufacturer and who do you get?  SOME YAHOO in INDIA
: that you can't understand and can't understand you!
: You want to know how to connect to the Internet and
: he's telling you how to hook up your printer.
:
: In May 1998, I purchased Word Perfect Suite 8
: Professional.  Microsoft Office was just too
: expensive.  Later, I discovered that a lot of what you
: could do with Word Perfect, you just couldn't do with
: Microsoft!
:
: Greg
:
: --- Vincente Aggrippino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > I apologize now for the long email... but didn't you
: > realize you were
: > posting a pro- MS Office message to the OOo user's
: > group? :)
: >
: > Let's forget the price for a moment. In real life,
: > Microsoft Office is
: > available to everyone for free. Those who choose not
: > to use pirated software
: > are noble, but that is a choice. It's not because
: > it's not available.
: >
: > Availability under Linux is also not a problem. I
: > can tell you from
: > experience that Microsoft Office XP works perfectly
: > under Linux with
: > Crossover Office.
: >
: > So, why use OpenOffice.org? How do I love thee? Let
: > me count the ways...
: >
: >    1. I don't like a monopoly. Even if it doesn't
: > fit the legal
: >    definition of a monopoly, I don't like the
: > feeling that Microsoft Office is
: >    the end-all and be-all of office productivity. In
: > this sense, if Microsoft
: >    was the one with the smaller market share, I
: > would probably support them.
: >    2. I like the concept that I might have some
: > input into the creation
: >    process. I have the source code and I can even
: > make changes myself. Does
: >    anyone know a Microsoft programmer? Does anyone
: > know someone who has worked
: >    on the code of Windows or Office, or even clippy?
: > I think they are locked in
: >    a secret bunker 25 miles below the ground in Area
: > 51.
: >
: > If Microsoft and OpenOffice.org (or any other
: > alternative) ever have close
: > to an equal market share, I may re-examine my
: > decision. However, I will not
: > use Microsoft products for the forseeable future.
: >
: > Often people come to me for advice in their
: > computing purchases and
: > decisions. I'll show them OpenOffice.org and
: > Firefox. Having worked in the
: > Information Technology field for over 15 years, I
: > can say that the advice I
: > give is at least valid.
: >
: > Microsoft has had the greatest measure of success in
: > making computers easier
: > to use for people who didn't know how to use
: > computers. The newest
: > generation of computer users know how to use a
: > computer. Having never known
: > life without a computer, they will blow us away...
: > yes, even the best of us.
: > They will make good, informed decisions based on
: > their own experience. And I
: > don't think they will overwhelmingly choose
: > Microsoft or any other
: > particular vendor. I mean to say that, someday,
: > there will be a fair
: > software market again.
: >
: >
: > On 10/25/05, John P Wohlscheid
: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > >
: > > To Whom It May Concern:
: > >
: > > First off I would like to clarify something. I'm
: > biased towards Microsoft
: > > products since they are the only things I have
: > ever used. I looked at the
: > > screenshots of your products out of curiosity and
: > I was surprised how much
: > > they look like Microsoft products. I understand
: > that you want to make it
: > > easy so that the few people the convert from
: > Microsoft products will not
: > > have
: > > trouble using yours, but in my opinion you should
: > try to give your
: > > products a
: > > different look.
: >
: >
: > I'll choose one very basic item to explain this: Why
: > is it that the File
: > menu is on the top left and, from that menu, you can
: > choose New, Open, and
: > Close? Because people are used to it.
: >
: > In computing, we've progressed to a stage where we
: > kind of do know how to
: > use computers as long as they work a certain way. I
: > have to honestly give
: > credit to Microsoft for this. Why change what
: > everyone is familiar with if
: > there's no problem with it and there's no
: > improvement to make.
: >
: > In fact, even if there is an improvement to make, it
: > might not be worth it.
: > For example, the "QWERTY" keyboard was designed to
: > slow down people typing
: > in English because old typewriters couldn't handle
: > fast fingers. Is anyone
: > using a Dvorak-style keyboard?
: >
: > Let me phrase it another way. Let's pretend that
: > there are
: > > two cars. They look a lot alike, except that one
: > has been around for
: > > years;
: > > it is trusted, and owned by hundreds of thousands
: > of people.
: >
: >
: > Haven't you noticed... in come classes cars do all
: > look and feel the same.
: > Have you seen a recent model sportscar without an
: > aerodynamic shape? How
: > about the SUV phenomenon? I don't even know where
: > that came from. It's all
: > for the same reason.
: >
: > There are proven methods that work for everyone.
: > Everyone is used to them
: > and there are no significant problems. When an
: > improvement is made, all of
: > the auto manufacturers will eventually adopt the
: > improvement. It might even
: > be mandatory: air bags, seat belts, third brake
: > light, anti-lock brakes,
: > 4-wheel steering, etc...
: >
: > If a
: > > middle-aged man was shown the two cars and it was
: > proven that they looked
: > > and
: > > felt the same, he would probably buy the older one
: > because of looks were
: > > the
: > > same, but the older one had more experience behind
: > its manufacturing.
: >
: >
: > This is just an unfortunate analogy... of course he
: > would choose the free
: > one. I get your point, but consider this: The
: > younger car company came into
: > existence because the users of the older car
: > company's products were unhappy
: > with the products and the way they did business. So,
: > they did something
: > about it and created an alternative.
: >
: > My
: > > advice (one man's opinion) is come out with a new
: > look and feel to your
: > > products. If you have a better product and a
: > different feel, I would saw
: > > that people would switch to you.
: >
: >
: > Now I'll be the target of some flames... We don't
: > have a better product,
: > just an alternative one, but a different look and
: > feel might hurt OOo and
: > might even make it difficult for the most faithful
: > of us.
: >
: > By the way, New Look and Feel? ...
: >
: >    - Mac OS / Xerox PARC Alto -> Microsoft Windows
: >    - Wordperfect -> Microsoft Word
: >    - Lotus Freelance / Harvard Graphics -> Microsoft
: > Powerpoint
: >    - ??? -> Microsoft Access... ok this is original
: > and terrible. Even MS
: >    knows it. Hence: MS SQL Server
: >    - Lotus 1-2-3 -> Microsoft Excel
: >
: >
: > Again, this is just one man's opinion.
: >
: >
: > You don't realize how fanatical us Open Source
: > people are, do you?... you
: > might want to move and change your name... Well, it
: > doesn't really matter.
: > We're all hackers... The Matrix has you and you're
: > not Neo... Just
: > kidding... you'll survive :)
: >
: === message truncated ===



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to