No, my question was really about features. Meaning, do I win anything by using the Suse version? Or is it better to use the the non-suse OO version? In other words, besides this problem of menus not matching 100%, do I gain something with Suse version that I would otherwise not have with OOo?
Thanks, Yaakov. On 3/16/06, Andy Pepperdine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 16 March 2006 14:21, Yaakov Chaikin wrote: > > Yes, I am using Suse. Is there something thatÅ› available in Suse OO > > thatÅ› not available in regular OO that can be downloaded from the > > openoffice.org? > > > > Thanks, > > Yaakov. > > I think you've got it wrong way round. There seems to be something (but I > don't know what) in Suse 10 which is blocking something in regular OO, or > perhaps precedes it in a path or something. Clearing out all OO from what > Suse delivered, and starting afresh with the regular OO download fixed it for > me. > > You can tell what Suse provided because they spell it OpenOffice (note the > caps), whereas all rpms from OOo are called openoffice (no caps) when you > search in Yast. The OOo rpm names do not match Suse package names. > > -- > Andy Pepperdine > > On this mailing list help is provided by volunteers. > Please subscribe to the mailing list to see all the replies to a query, > and reply only to the mailing list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For FAQ, userguide, see: http://documentation.openoffice.org/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Yaakov
