Archbishop John Missing wrote:
Before this discussion moves on to another list, I think I should point out who a user is: the only reason for the product to be produced and the only one who can judge the quality of the product. If the product is not meeting the users needs, then it is useless to spend any time or money on it. If the only recommendation to solve a user's problems is to get a different product, then is there any need for the product in the beginning. If, as many here assert, OpenOffice is superior to all these other programs, why does it not meet all the needs that the other programs did, even if it has to use a different means to achieve it. Neither the demand for "reveal codes" not the insistence that is is unnecessary addresses the issue that there is a real need for the *user who is, after all the only reason for the product.*
Well said. -- Robin Laing --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
