Robin wrote:

> No, there are just a bunch of styles menus with a bunch of styles that have 
> other problems.

Such as? ? ?

>Both have their own complexity.  As one person said, they have over
2000 styles.

Since that is a reference to me, I'll point out that I know what the
difference between any two styles I have is.  And why it  was created,
and used.

And having that many greatly simplifies things for me.

> I always try to think simple.  To me reveal codes is simple.

Styles are simpler --- one doesn't have to remember what attributes to
change.  Just remember what style to change.  Much easier, simpler,
and cleaner.

>Styles are complex because a style can do allot at once.

And they are very predictable in what they will change.
Unlike WP, where one requires Reveal Codes, because a simple change
can have UNEXPECTED, results, with UNPREDICTABLE side-effects.

> will do, this can be great.  What happens if there is a character style that 
> is within this paragraph?

Displays the character properly.

> But that is what I do understand.  This is why I suggest a single box that 
> displays each of these without having to click through multiple windows.

I haven't looked at _Styles: Their Attributes and Effects_ recently.
For some types of styles, you have over a hundred different options.

Do you really want a screen that displays each of those options, for
every character?
[Just thinking about the wasted screen estate gives me the shivers. 
That it would further hinder productivity is another reason to not
implement it.]

> which is a space?  You have one character space that may be enough to

Make up your mind.  Is that space the only character with the style
difference, or is the space the start of a new block of text with the
same style?

It doesn't make any difference in either the short run, or the long
run, because it is trivial to determine what the attributes of that
character, or text block are.   You don't need Reveal Code
functionality to determine those attributes.

> inside and out I will even grow to like them but in my case, I don't want 
> 2000+ styles to have to remember and use.

A tool for every job.  And I wouldn't be at all surprised if I could
take over your position, and reformat the documents in half the time
you take, because I have 2 000 + styles, and don't have to play "hunt
for the incorrect code".   [Remember what I said about the only
assumption I make --- "that the person who gave me the document won't
notice the reformatting I have done."  Ponder on what that means, when
applied to a document that is given to you in a plethora of file
formats, markup languages,  character encoding, and other things
designed to annoy one.]

> How about a document on Styles for WordPerfect users?

It would be all of one paragraph long:

xan

jonathon
--
Ethical conduct is a vice.
Corrupt conduct is a virtue.

Motto of Nacarima.

Reply via email to