On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 19:18 -0400, Matt Needles wrote:
> G. Roderick Singleton wrote:
> 
> >On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 15:40 -0400, Matt Needles wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 12:03 -0400, Pete Holsberg wrote:
> >>    
> >>
> >>>John W. Kennedy typed the following on 7/2/2006 11:22 AM:
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>Pete Holsberg wrote:
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>>>G. Roderick Singleton typed the following on 7/2/2006 7:49 AM:
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 05:35 -0400, Lars D. Noodén wrote:
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I looked at the install instructions and the OOo FAQ and see no 
> >>>>>>>explicit description of when one should install the binary including 
> >>>>>>>JRE and when one should install the binary without JRE.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>When should one choose the one over the other?  In a nutshell, what's 
> >>>>>>>the difference? (and can we get it put in the FAQ?)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>See http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/index.html . In 
> >>>>>>particular 
> >>>>>>http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/installation/021.html 
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>"For example, with 1.1 you will not be able to use the XSLT 
> >>>>>functionality, JDBC, applets, form generators, and Java Application 
> >>>>>Programming Interfaces (APIs) for 3rd party modules, if no Java is 
> >>>>>installed."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>For example? Not exactly definitive!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What is XSLT functionality?
> >>>>>JBDC?
> >>>>>Which applets?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/installation/022.html
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>"You can download Java from http://www.java.com  or http://java.sun.com.";
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/installation/023.html
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>"Which version of Java do I need?"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/installation/024.html
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>Not at all applicable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>http://documentation.openoffice.org/faqs/installation/025.html
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>"Can I install Java after I install OpenOffice.org?"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>There has to be a simple answer to the question, "Do I need to download 
> >>>>>JRE for OOo?"
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>
> >>>>There is no real simple answer, because the situation isn't simple.
> >>>>
> >>>>The pragmatic simple answer is, "If you don't have, or know whether you 
> >>>>have, a JRE, get the version that contains one."
> >>>>
> >>>>For some people, that will the /wrong/ answer, but it will be "mostly 
> >>>>harmless".
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>>So why not it a no-brainer and offer only the "with JRE" version? 
> >>>I know -- because of the people with dial-up. Maybe they should 
> >>>have a footnote or something that directs them to a CD.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>I have a better (?) suggestion: why not do what M$ does?  Leave it out,
> >>but when the user tries to use a part of the app that needs it, start
> >>the process of downloading and installing the JRE. That will make OOo as
> >>small as possible for the initial download, with the possibility of
> >>adding the missing functionality easily later on.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Not a bad idea. What is the number of the RFE so I can add my vote.
> >  
> >
> It's at http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=66978. 
> A possible related issue at 
> http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=21536
> 
Added two to 66978
-- 
G. Roderick Singleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PATH tech

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



Reply via email to