On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:44:33 +0100
Harold Fuchs wrote:

> 
> 
> On Sunday, September 17, 2006 9:25 PM [GMT+1=CET], Michael Adams
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> > No they don't. I can vouch it works very well. And i have mine setup
> > so i select reply to all, when i reply to moderated emails.
> > 
> > When it doesn't work so well is when someone who is not setup
> > correctly (A) replies, and someone else (B) must redirect the email.
> > By reposting to the list the original replyer (A) learns about
> > moderated posts and quickly sets themselves up.
> > 
> > By the way list, is the process for doing this on
> > Outlook/Thunderbird worth a web page?
> 
> Not sure what you mean by "set up correctly". AFAIK Outlook Express
> offers no such facility so it is not possible to be "correct".
> 
> Also, with OE at least, Reply All doesn't work the way I'd expect. I
> haven't investigated in detail, and can't be bothered to do so, but
> what I get mostly is the address [email protected] in the To: list
> *twice* (correctly punctuated) and the "unsubscribed" user's address,
> if there is one, not at all.
> 
> In the case of *your* message - the one to which I am replying (*not*
> Reply All) - that happened anyway and I had to delete one of the
> occurrences. I have not seen this before. Perhaps it's because of the
> weird way you have your e-mail set up ;-)
> 

Yes, i have reply-to: explicitly set in my email program. That is
because there is no point in emailing me on this address. It is outgoing
only to reduce spam.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to