Fred A. Miller wrote: > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 6:34 pm, James Knott wrote:
>> I forgot to mention, at the company where OO was used, I installed Linux >> on my computer, though most in the company used Windows. I even had one >> OS/2 system to support. > > I guess I'm in a unique position, where I can refuse to support MickySoft - > ONLY replace it with SUSE Linux. I know many who wish they could do the same. Where I am right now, there's one Windows app, that might work with Linux & Wine, though I haven't tried it yet. If it works I'll be switching to Linux, as everything else I do has native Linux support. My manager also thinks Linux is a good idea. Also, supporting that one OS/2 bax didn't keep me busy. In the two years I was there, I only had to make one, 1, count 'em one config change. Other than that, it just did it's job day after day after day. OS/2 is just like Linux in that respect. It just works, no fuss no muss. Unlike Windows... Back when I was providing 3rd level support on OS/2 at IBM, I also supported some apps on Windows 95 and NT. With OS/2, problems were rare. On the other hand, Windows problems kept me busy. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
