Henri,

OOo has already succeeded as the many users of OOo can attest.

Wether OOo will displace MS Office or any other program is academic.
OOo offers a very good office suite that runs on Wndows, Mac OS X, Linux,
BSD Unix, Solaris, etc. And it is localized to many languages that other
office suites are not. It is also open source and very inexpensive compared
to commercial offerings.

While there are many things I might ask of an office suite that are not perfect
in OOo, they are not perfect in other office suites either.

I do agree that it could probably be trimmed of a few bells and whistles in some areas. But given that hard disk space is very inexpensive these days and RAM is likewise getting to be less of an issue on all but very old machines, the remaining issue is load times. If you open and close OOo many times a day to use one portion such as Writer, it is a problem. If on the other hand you open it once and leave it open
all day long as I do, this is only a minor annoyance at worst.


Ross Bernheim


On Oct 29, 2006, at 8:12, M. Henri Day wrote:

Dear James,

Interesting article, which should help to encourage a more open view of the
possibility of using OOo among business users, who tend to be loathe to
experiment. As a home user I am not subject in equal degree to the
productivity constraints and switch-over costs that occupy such people,
while purchase costs perhaps weigh higher in my case. On the grapevine the most common disadvantages attributed to OOo are that the suite is bloated and slow. Stability is, if I have understood the matter aright, generally
regarded as good. My question is thus: to the degree that the problems
mentioned above are real, what is being done to address them ? How does, for
example, 2.0.4 compare with its predecessor in these respects ? Does it
require more or less hard disk space or the same ; does operating it require more or less RAM ? How does it compare in this regard with the Microsoft Office suite ? These are the pivotal questions - in addition to the still more basic one of whether tools of this kind should be computer or web-based - which in my opinion are going to determine the fate of OOo. For my part, I
do hope OOo succeeds ; we all find ourselves very much in need of an
alternative to Redmond's products (and in particular, their marketing
practices) !...

Henri

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to