I'll respectfully disagree -- top-posting is much more efficient in
terms of recipient's time if the recipient is so inclined. As I am. I
top-post and I top-read and I don't want anyone to tell me to do
otherwise. I think that way. If you don't, then feel free to ignore my
posts; just don't try to tell me (or others) how to think and act.
For the original poster, email addresses are continually being harvested
by bots. I don't take any special precautions to "protect" my one true
email address, and most of the spam I receive is readily disposed of by
my Thunderbird email reader. There are more important things to worry
about than an email address that appeared over a year ago.
M. Fioretti wrote:
(Stephanie: on public mailing list, please do not top post and, above
all, do not retransmit the whole message you are replying to: the
subscribers have no need to download (paying, if on a metered
connection) the same message twice)
Further comments inline.
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 14:00:26 PM -0600, Stephanie Boulee
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If you are really concerned with your personal email address being
seen, I would go to a website like yahoo that provides free email
accounts.
[snip]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
