NoOp: Not all OpenOffice.org users choose to join or even participate in this list. Thus this meets the technical definition of volunteer, one who gives freely of his or her time to help others. I do so and so do you, at least I'm under that impression. No one pays me to be here (at least not that I'm aware of) although it can and does lead to paying employment by other companies or even governments. I know of no one on this list that is paid by OpenOffice.org nor its main sponsor, Sun Microsystems, that are paid to provide user support through this list. Do you have a counter argument to these statements. I would gladly like to read it. And some of the folks who are here do not use OpenOffice.org but rather derivatives, such as BROffice or NeoOffice. I do apologize to the list for this subject remaining here, but I feel that appropriate wording of the README is paramount so that we can properly describe who we are and what our function is within this community of users.
James McKenzie -----Original Message----- >From: NoOp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Feb 21, 2007 10:37 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [users] Re: Bug found in OOo 2.1 > >On 02/21/2007 06:47 PM, James Mckenzie wrote: > >> As I stated earlier, this is a volunteer staffed mailing list, and it is >> primarily in > >I was unaware that this is a "volunteer staffed" mailing list. As far as >I know this mailing list (and it's counterpart nntp/gmane news group >feed) is simply comprised of other OOo users... is that not correct? Or, >is there actually a "volunteer staff" that actually service this list/group? > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
