On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 07:46:21 -0600 Dan Lewis wrote: > On Wednesday March 07 2007 7:09 am, Guy Voets wrote: > > 2007/3/7, James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > There was a large coloured block about his church. I couldn't do > > > a normal reply without including it. I had to create a reply, > > > delete everything and then cut 'n paste portions of the original > > > message, so that I could reply without including it. > > > > > > It's bad enough that some people include such stuff in their > > > messages, but something else again, when I can't reply without > > > including it. > > > > +1 > > The colored block was unnecessary. To make matters even worse, it > > contained a link to how to create a similar type signature. So, I > completely agree in this case. > While I do not have any problems with a religious tone in one's > signature, a certain amount of discretion is important. Advertizing > one's church or suggesting others consider one's point of view on > religion go beyond what is proper in a signature. >
In my email client i can highlight the part of an email i wish to reply to before i click reply. -- Michael Those that can, do; those that can't, teach. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
