Alan Frayer wrote:
> Jonathon,
>
> I found your note interesting, but must take exception to one point:
>
> jonathon wrote:
>> Remember, both individuals, and a SOHO business has
>> _nothing_ to lose by going to a jury trial.   Microsoft has
>> everything to lose, if they get into a jury trial regarding
>> its patents.
>>   
>
> Microsoft may have much to lose by going to a jury trial against a
> SOHO, but that won't prevent the lawsuits, or the threat of the same.
> The SOHO has more to lose: its existence.
>
> See, a common tactic in civil suits is to simply outlast the
> opposition. When you have deep pockets and your opponent does not, you
> can feel fairly confident that your opponent will run out of money
> defending itself before the case ever reaches a jury. The SOHO, which
> simply cannot raise the funds to provide an adequate defense, will
> either agree to an out-of-court settlement admitting guilt, or will
> eventually declare bankruptcy ... and either way, Microsoft wins.
>
> Granted, it paints Microsoft as the bad guy, going after the SOHO, but
> for them it is a winnable situation, versus one where they go after
> another major player. Given that, I cannot rule out Microsoft
> targeting selected SOHOs, just to make a point. After all, they do
> that routinely, already, through their participation in the SPA
> anti-piracy raids.
>

With all due respect, I think you're underestimating what Microsoft is
facing.
Right now they have a European Union that is breathing down their necks
hard and an administration change in little over a year and a half to
face.  It may be possible that the next administration is just as
conservative and business-friendly as the first one, but I doubt it. 
And as to the former, they have a EU that is seriously considering
ordering them to break up not to mention massive fines.  If Microsoft
takes a shot at Oma und Opa GmbH, it could be the straw to break the
camels back.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to