On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:12:04 -0600
Trevor Farlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Frank: Thanks for your suggestion.  However in Linux, using Thunderbird
> 2.0, I get the same behavior Brian described.  Perhaps it's Thunderbird,
> not MS. 

No, Brian's X-Mailer string is "QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9"

It just appears odd that "Reply-All" seems to be interpreted as "Reply-to-Some"
by, apparently, at least two mail clients.  It's certainly not the behaviour
that one would expect based on the button captioning, if nothing else.

>  At any rate, despite just graduating from college, there's an
> old geek streak inside me that cringes at the slightest bit of extra
> mail being sent.

How so?  I'm definitely the stereotypical "old geek" (though I try to avoid the
Unix Beard), and I'll admit that I have a bit of a "mania" for
file compression and the like, but can't say that I've ever had any "objection"
to email, with the obvious exception of spam runs of course.

> just hope I didn't
> inadvertently start a newsgroup vs. mailing list flame war...

I'm glad you brought this up.  I actually subscribed to this mailing list to
ask a particular question.  Sadly, nobody appears to know the answer (or at
least, nobody has responded to the question, which amounts to the same thing
from a practical point of view).  I was about to un-subscribe and return to my
usual haunts, so to speak, but now that this has come up I've become interested
in this thread and will hang about for a while to see what pops up.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to