M Henri Day wrote: > 2007/6/26, Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> On Jun 26, 2007, at 1:35 PM, M Henri Day wrote: >> >> > 2007/6/26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >> >> There are hidden costs. For one, a VERY buggy office suite. I am >> >> using >> >> it for a business now, piloting the software as my company is >> >> considereing >> >> switching. I can 99.9% guarantee you that the cost you pay in time >> >> dealing with bugs and design flaws is much more costly than just >> >> buying MS >> >> Office. >> >> >> >> If you care about your data, don't use OpenOffice. >> > >> > >> > Could you be more specific about the bugs you've detected ? Doing >> > so might help developers eliminate them and users avoid them.... >> > >> > Henri >> >> He is unable to. His straw-man argument would begin to fall apart, >> and be exposed as FUDDER >> >> --- >> Rodney D. Myers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Registered Linux User #96112 >> ICQ#: AIM#: YAHOO: >> 18002350 mailman452 mailman42_5 >> >> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a >> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. >> Ben Franklin - 1759 > > > Not possessing Mr Schirmacher's experience, I can't be sure of that his > complaints are not real. Methodologically, I think it better to assume > that > they are real and ask him to be specific, so that the difficulties may be > addressed if, indeed, they do exist, and dismissed if they do not.... > > Henri >
Too true, though I could guess that by the lack of a response from him they don't exist, although in fairness I have sent him a copy so that he can actually post up any of these "bugs" so that they might either be fixed or addressed. One must give your critics the benefit of the doubt if only so that you don't fall into the trap of just dismissing them out of hand and not addressing any legitimate claims. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
