On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 22:44 +0100, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Matthew!
> 
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:52:24PM -0400, Matthew Harrison wrote:
> > Then my question is now "why in the world are you using Linux?"
> > You're describing things that aren't an issue at all if you know some
> > basics about Linux, and if you use a package manager, all of this
> > virtually disappears.  Perhaps you would be happier with an OS that
> > barely changes for years at a time such as Win2k?
> 
> I love using Linux!  It's a wonderful system to use!  So versatile, so
> flexible, free (in both senses).  I actually know somewhat more than the
> basics of the system.  I'm a bash and AWK script enthusiast, and I hack
> Emacs.  I've set up a qmail server running to connect me with my ISP.
> 
> It's _installing_ and _configuring_ the system which I detest.  Finding
> the necessary info seems a black art.  It took me a whole day and a half
> to get my printer working, for example.  I don't think there's a coherent
> description of how to configure the network stuff anywhere.  Of course,
> it doesn't help that the main IDE controller on my motherboard is hd[gh],
> and its hardware address shifts each time I add another card in.  Maybe
> things would be less bad if I next installed something like Ubuntu.
> 
> By contrast, installing Win2k is about as difficult as inserting the DVD
> into a virgin machine, but it's really not the sort of system I want.
> 
> As for package managers, they're like magic spells.  When they work,
> they're wonderful, when they don't, they're a nightmare.  At least when
> you build and install from a tarball, you can see what's going on, and
> you can be reasonably sure that the Makefile won't be doing anything
> "helpful" behind your back.  It was a package manager which failed to
> install the OO help file(s) on my system, for example, and it was another
> package manager which dismantled Jonathon's X-Windows when he
> de-installed Firefox.  Unfortunately, building things from source is only
> practical for isolated programs.
> 
> > I'm a full-time Linux user that runs a bleeding-edge Gentoo system on
> > the unstable branch (meaning, I use the latest of everything on my
> > system whether or not the Gentoo gods have deemed the software stable)
> > and this isn't the experience I have with it at all.  Updating
> > openoffice is as easy as typing "emerge openoffice (or openoffice-bin
> > if I don't want to wait for a compile)" when a new version is
> > available, and my package manager handles the rest - config files
> > intact.  I really suggest using a different operating system or
> > learning some Linux basics and using a package manager.  There's just
> > no good reason to be using 1.1.3, really.
> 
> There would be no reason to install 1.1.3 from scratch.  However, given
> that it works on my system, and I can work it on my system (more or
> less), the right time to install the new version is when I've got several
> days of calm in which I can learn its idosyncrasies in peace, not when
> I'm hopelessly stressed out like I am at the moment.
> 
> It would be nice to have the help working, though.
> 
> I put it to you that the way you continually update your system isn't an
> easy natural thing to do at all; rather, it's a highly refined skill that
> you've developed over an extended period.
> 

Hi Alan,

I installed Red Hat 8 and 9 before they went commercial. I have to say
that those distros were not up to casual use by my wife.  Recently, I
installed Ubuntu.  I have to say, even though I have had a few problems,
it has been great. My wife can use Evolution and Open Office.  I am a
programmer and my complaint is that OO dox are difficult if not
impossible to get.  However, I am new to Open Office (OO) programming,
so it probably will get better.  My Canon scanner won't work and the
Lexmark 32 printer works only after a fashion.  Canons says
http://www.hamrick.com has a front-end for the scanner for about 40
bucks.  As far as the printer goes, I have been considering an HP laser
printer even b4 Ubuntu in order to save on ink carts.  At any rate, I am
happy with Ubuntu and Synaptic, the package manager.  Synaptic is way
cool compared to what I had to do in Redhat in order to install stuff.
I'm not going back to Uncle Bill.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to