Ken Burnside wrote: >> Even Yahoo or Google groups won't strip your name and address if they >> are *explicitly* included *as text* within the post as in the OP's case. >> > > And Yahoo and Google Groups are quite explicit, when you sign up for > them, that the archives are either public or private. This list is > *not*, and it should be. > > >> The OP *explicitly* included his/her full postal address and two (cell & >> home) telephone numbers as *part of the text* of his/her message. I >> contend that if you do that you have no right to complain that any >> "social contract" has been broken. >> > > Respectfully, I disagree. While I agree that the original mistake was > Aricka's, as a recent list subscriber, I understand *exactly* how she > made it, even if it was made from incorrect assumptions. > > The difference here is one of perspective. I'm trying to make sure > that what she did (in all innocence) doesn't come back to bite someone > else on the ass. > >
Perhaps a notice to that effect could be included in the email that has to be replied to for the subscription to become effective. -- Use OpenOffice.org <http://www.openoffice.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
