Harold Fuchs wrote:
On 01/08/07, jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
and how they could be made to work effectively for us but all we get is
silence or "it's on the 'too hard' pile".
If it requires changing anything on the Collabnet part of
things, then it is impossible to do.
OTOH, it would take about an hour to configure a procmail
script to send a message to unsubscribed users stating that
their message was sent to a mailing list that is publicly
archived on several places on the Internet, and they
probably will miss answers if they aren't subscribed to the
list.
The major concern with users/subscribers doing that, is that
the sender gets the notice/message from two or more people.
xan
jonathon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to remember someone a few months ago saying something about such
autoresponse messages being deemed to be spam and thus blocked.
I think the autoresponse message is a good idea but you are correct in
the thought of being spam. The issue here is someone makes a post to
the list but isn't subscribed. They would get a response from the
listserver to say they are not subscribed and how to subscribe. One
message, not a bunch of message.
How many messages are answered on this list where the responder has to
make an effort to reply to the OP?
--
Due to the move to Exchange Server,
anything that is a priority, please phone.
Robin Laing
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
