Steve wrote: > Point being it is misrepresented and they charge an exorbitant amount guised > as /Microsoft Office Clone/.
a) At least one court case has alluded to these sites, pointing out that just because something can be distributed for free, it does not mean that it has to be distributed for free. b) Most of the claims made on the site that are not "true", can be dismissed as advertizing puffery. As such, the "misrepresentation" claim falls apart; c) The site in question claims it is an MSO alternative. Not an MSO clone. There is a small, but technical difference between the two. xan jonathon -- OOo can not correct for incompetence in creating documents from MSO. Furthermore,OOo can not compensate for the defective and flawed security measures used by Microsoft. As such, before using this product for exams that require faulty and defective software, ensure that you will not be unjustly penalized for the incompetence of the organization that requires the use of software that is known to be flawed, defective, bug-ridden, and fails to meet ISO file format standards. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
