Frank wrote: >NOT the fact that they are distributing OO, but that they are not meeting their obligations under the LGPL.
a) Who is authorized to sue the vendors whose distribution of OOo violates the obligations of the LGPL? b) Why is that entity not taking action against vendors of OOo who violate their obligations under the LGPL? xan jonathon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
