On 10/18/2007 07:18 PM, Bob Long wrote: > "NoOp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> On 10/18/2007 06:53 PM, Charlie Seaman wrote: >> >>> >>> And, if we're really picking at things, ">98", would really not be >>> inclusive of 98, since the ">" means "greater than" not "greater than or >>> equal to". I thought of explaining that but really did not want to get >>> into the website being wrong. >> >> Charlie: that's a *very* good point actually. Particularly when >> http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/sys_reqs_20.html shows: >> > [..] > >> In the past, there have been other complaints/threads regarding this >> issue, but I've yet to see it fixed. IMO a great many of the "can this >> be installed on" questions could be cleared up by simply fixing the OOo >> website. > > I opened an issue for this back in February: > http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=74860 > Perhaps voting for it may help. >
Thanks for that. Voted for & commented. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
