On 25/03/2008, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Dotan, > > niche to meet you here... > > Am 2008-03-23 13:25:13, schrieb Dotan Cohen: > > > Michelle, it is not clear to me what you are doing. Are you using > > Writer or Calc? I will assume writer as you mention Winword. > > > Yes of course "oowriter"... > > > > You would like a table like this, with the numbers being added > automatically: > > > > | header | header | more.....| > > | 1 | .. | .........| > > | 2 | .. | .........| > > | 3 | .. | .........| > > | 4 | .. | .........| > > > > Let me know if this is what you mean. > > > Yes, this is what I need. In Winword, I have selected the cells > from A2 to A5 and then choosen to numerate it. Which results in > a the figure shown above.
You select A2 to A5 in Writer?!? That sounds like Calc to me. > But this does not work in OOo. In Calc, I can insert the number 5 into A2, then select the cell and drag down to A5. A3 gets 6, A4 gets 7, and A5 gets 8. > > And in Winword, if I have added a new ROW after "2" and the whole > numerotation was updated. Alas, in OOo this is not the case. I will file a bug. > The problem is, I have tried to imported old Winword 6.0 (16bit) > documents the they all screwed up whit tables like this... Ha!! You should see what the latest MS Office will do to those documents, if it will even open them at all after SP1. No kidding, I've seen it first hand. This is a case of Open Office supporting MS Office formats _much_ better than the latest MSO. This is _exactly_ why one should never store documents in a proprietary format. Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
