OP didn't get CC'd

2008/3/28, Jack D. Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> web at work wrote the following on 3/28/2008 10:11 AM:
>
> > AND for those who say only download it from OOo's web site or its
> > mirrors,
> > I would have loved to download it from a mirror, but that page is either
> > buried somewhere or it was lost in the move to the new web site.
>
>
> Since I was CC'd on this, I assume you must have been referring to me. I
> don't believe I said to ONLY download it from OOo's website. I merely
> pointed out that he wouldn't need p2p if he downloaded from there.
> Anybody who has ever loaded a web page knows by now that on occasion
> every site will appear to be 'down' and not load for you or be extremely
> slow. It's also obvious from some of the posts that come into this list
> that, while there are a multitude of places where one can download OOo,
> not all of them are exactly ethical in the way they offer their
> downloads of OOo. For that very reason, I don't think it's wrong to
> point people to the 'official' download site.
>
> I could be mistaken, but I believe the purpose of the OOo bouncer is to
> select one of the primary or mirror sites for the offered download based
> upon traffic, therefore there would be no specific need to have a
> separate page for mirrors.
>
> --
>
> Jack
>

Reply via email to