<snip>lots of stuff where people talk about their favourite email
client</snip>
Isn't this *exactly* the reason why OOo should *not* have a bundled
email client?
I use TB, someone else uses Pegasus, someone else might use Seamonkey,
Spicemonkey, Zimbra, Evolution and this list continues...
I can't believe how many times this question comes up. It is based on
users' assumption that Outlook/Outlook Express is part of Office.
Technically it is just another standalone application that has some
integration hooks to their office applications.
The real answer should be to continue to promote OOo and increase it's
adoption and publicise the fact that is has a very nice and *open* API
(Java?) to which *any* email client could interface if the developer and
users so wished.
To the chap who suggested Pegasus: I have never even heard of it and do
not want to use non-open source products, so why should your preference
impact me? Send the Pegasus developer a link to the OOo developer site
and ask him - nicely - to take a look at providing some integration
hooks in his application. Do you know what it is you want it to do BTW?
Alan
--
The way out is open!
http://www.theopensourcerer.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
