On 06/23/2008 09:14 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote: > 2008/6/23 Drew Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Hello Dotan, >> >> Just curious - if the extension does what is needed why is it a workaround >> and not a solution? >> >> NOTE - I am not saying it does or does not solve the problem, but it didn't >> sound to me like you where saying that either - so wondered why you would >> make the distinction there? >> > > I am likely not the only person with this issue, and the online docs > do refer to the OOo behaviour as irregular? unstandard? (I'm too lazy > to check). Installing the extension (which I'm not doing) would solve > the problem for me, but may introduce other issues. The solution would > involve bringing the OOo behaviour in line with standard behaviour at > best, and at worst would involve assigning \n to a single entity no > matter where it is used.
You might file a bug. However before you do, you might want to have a look at these: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10815 http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=15666 Another helpful write-up: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/garryknight/linux/ooregexp.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
