Can I suggest that you put the mailing list information as the signature line? So the important information in the email is top posted?
Dino > On Sep 20, 2016, at 2:28 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Send Users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: About mobility support based on OOR (LISP) > (Alberto Rodriguez-Natal) > 2. Re: Problems configuring oor on a openwrt router (Albert López) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:28:23 -0700 > From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <[email protected]> > To: YoonSeon Han <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OOR-Users] About mobility support based on OOR (LISP) > Message-ID: > <CA+YHcKHKnCj=Ekm14C7E++=KJAZaRYSA=qzddnwt_jvuzxx...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi YoonSeon, > > There is a NETCONF interface to configure OOR on runtime that you may want > to take a look at. > > https://github.com/OpenOverlayRouter/oor/tree/master/netconf > > Unfortunately, I'm afraid that it is targeted only towards xTR config at > this point. However, extending it for MS support should be feasible in case > you want to give it a try. > > Another option you can look into would be to use OOR in combination with > OpenDaylight serving as MS/MR. > > https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/OpenDaylight_Lisp_Flow_Mapping:Main > > Hope this helps, > Alberto > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:54 PM, YoonSeon Han <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear OOR contributors, >> >> Hi, I'm Yoonseon Han who interested in to use LISP for my mobility >> support. >> Now, I'm doing a small project to support virtual machine mobility. >> >> My question is how can I add new VM mapping info. to local OOR database? >> For example, Host A is migrated from xTR1 to xTR2. >> Then, I need to remove the mapping information at xTR1, and add new >> mapping to xTR2, as well as mapping system. >> But, I cannot find a command or interface to access OOR local database. >> >> The only way for my case is >> 1) turn off OOR >> 2) edit OOR.conf fie with new mapping db. >> 3) turn on OOR again >> >> Is there any way to change local data base dynamically such as CLI, REST, >> or other interface? >> Best regards. >> >> /Yoonseon Han >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160919/3cc0f719/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:33:56 +0200 > From: Albert López <[email protected]> > To: Holger Zuleger <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OOR-Users] Problems configuring oor on a openwrt router > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed" > > Hi, > > I have tried the rloc probe with our Cisco box and it replies our Map > Request Probe messages: > > Sep 20 08:41:10.936: LISP: Received map request for IID 0 0.0.0.0/32, > source_eid UNSPEC, ITR-RLOCs: 84.88.81.70, records 1, nonce > 0x36FFE15F-0x17B6CF26, probe > Sep 20 08:41:10.936: LISP: Processing map request record for EID prefix > IID 0 0.0.0.0/32 > Sep 20 08:41:10.936: LISP-0: IID 0 No local EID prefix covering map > request for 0.0.0.0/32. > Sep 20 08:41:10.940: LISP-0: Sending dummy map-reply from 147.83.131.33 > to 84.88.81.70. > > May be the difference is that my box is only configured as a PeTR > > Anyway, I have checked how Cisco boxes send Map Request Probe to PeTR > and they use 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0/32. I have generated a new ipk > file which will request for this EID prefix. > > Could you try and let me know if it works with this change. > > Best regards > > Albert > > > On 20/09/16 00:12, Holger Zuleger wrote: >> Hi again, >> >>>> In your configuration you have rloc-probing enabled. The xTR node is >>>> >>>> sending probe messaged to the PeTR node but it doesn't receive any reply >>>> and after three retries it sets the RLOC of the PeTR to not reachable. >>> Ok, makes sense. Sorry this is something I could/should have found out >>> myself. >> ... >> >>> I will test the proposed config change later today and give you a >>> feedback if it was successful. >> Indeed this was the problem. Turning off the probing solved it. >> >> But I was a bit confused why the PeTR are not responding to the probe >> messages, and turned the lisp debugging on. >> >> When the oor router sends a probe message... >> >> [2016/9/19 22:29:33] DEBUG: Retry Map-Request Probe for locator >> 109.235.46.40 and EID: 0.0.0.0/32 (2 retries) >> >> I see something like this in the Cisco debug (the timers are not >> consistently, but I'm pretty sure that the output is related to the >> probe message): >> >> Sep 19 21:29:23.957: LISP: Received map request for IID 0 0.0.0.0/32, >> source_eid UNSPEC, ITR-RLOCs: 185.122.6.142, records 1, nonce >> 0x203CFDA2-0x77FCFDBB, probe >> Sep 19 21:29:23.957: LISP: Processing map request record for EID prefix >> IID 0 0.0.0.0/32 >> Sep 19 21:29:23.957: LISP-0: IID 0 No local EID prefix covering map >> request for 0.0.0.0/32. >> >> Later on the oor router give up with: >> [2016/9/19 22:29:38] DEBUG: rloc_probing: No Map-Reply Probe received >> for locator 109.235.46.40 and EID: 0.0.0.0/32 -> Locator state changes >> to DOWN >> >> So two question came up in my mind >> 1) Is the common way to probe a PeTR to send a map request for EID >> 0.0.0.0/32, and why is the src_EID unspecified? >> 2) Does it mean I have to install a local mapping for this on the PeTR >> router? And if yes how does it look like? >> >> Best Regards >> Holger >> > > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: oor_1.1-2_ar71xx.ipk > Type: application/octet-stream > Size: 94019 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: > <http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160920/2f35d0bc/attachment.obj> > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 7 > ************************************ _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
