Klaus, But, doesn't append_branch cause parallel forking? I don't want parallel forking. If I do parallel forking, the same registration may get delivered to the same Asterisk box twice, and that's not what I want.
Doug. -----Original Message----- From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 9:01 AM To: Douglas Garstang Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Users] More Routing.... Where's the problem? in route[1] or in the failure route? You need append branch in failure route klaus Douglas Garstang wrote: > Can someone please tell me why the following extremely simple example doesn't > first attempt to relay to 192.168.10.7, and then if that fails, try > 192.168.10.8? What am I missing here? The documentation says that t_relay() > simple sends statefully to the current URI.... seems to be what I am doing. > What am I missing? Please help! > > route(1); > > route[1] { > rewritehostport("192.168.10.7:5060"); > t_on_failure("2"); > t_relay(); > } > > failure_route[2] { > rewritehostport('192.168.10.8:5060"); > t_relay(); > } > > Doug. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
