Helge Waastad wrote:
Hi,
I just wonder if this is according to RFC.
I have a UA (ekiga) which adds a Route:<OBP>;lr in INVITE
Is this "legal"?
At least in default scripts, it's being loose routed, and not following
normal message processing...
Yes, this is fine. This is a "pre-loaded" route. They work fine in my
setup as long as:
- the client uses loose routing (this is the case in your scenario)
- the proxy known that it is responsible for the host/IP in the Route
header (by default these are the IP addresses openser is listening on.
For domains they must be specified by alias=....)
e.g. this is not processed in the loose_route block (openser 1.0.0):
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.50:5088;rport;branch=z9hG4bK662862690
Route: <sip:83.136.32.160;lr>
From: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=3909918647
To: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
regards
klaus
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
