Helge Waastad wrote:
Hi,
excellent.
Now I at least understood my problem.
I will have a loose_route problem in a "dispatcher/OBP scenario" since
the route header will not be the proxy it self, but the OBP/Dispatcher
address, hence a routing loop will occure...
(Probably Loose routing should be done at OBP layer...I just have to
figure it out.)
The the OBP is addressed using a pre-loaded route, it should remove the
Route header and forward it to the main proxy. Maybe the problem is the
route header:
Route:<OBP>;lr
Is the OBP really inside <> or is this just your formatting?
klaus
Thanks,
br hw
man, 13,.03.2006 kl. 17.35 +0200, skrev Bogdan-Andrei Iancu:
by default, loose_route() function detects the pre-loaded route: if
there is only one Route hdr pointing to the server, it will be consumed
and loose_route() will return false. If more than one Route hdr is
present, the routing will be done as usual - function will consume the
Route and set the destination to the next Route - true is returned.
regards,
bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
Helge Waastad writes:
I did modify my (a little-bit confused) loose route to loose route only
INVITES/ACK with totags (has_totag). The rest should be going through
the normal ACL procedures.
that won't help you with phones line nokia, which add Route header to
INITIAL request (which never have To tags).
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
