What do you mean a 'simple' SIP-Proxy? Is it UA -- SIPproxy -- UA? I have also tested openser without using NAT (All device is in the same network). But the maximum number of current calls is only around 80. For the configuration file, I use those files download from http://www.onsip.org/. I think they are the simple configuration that I can trust. Finally, just want to say the target usage of openser. Does it target for a small group of users instead of a global voip environment?
On 5/30/06, Edson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My two cents: OpenSER/SER can handle hundreds of concurrent calls, but as a 'simple' SIP-Proxy not as a media-proxy (RTP-Proxy). Your numbers would be clearer if You could aggregate information on the loads only from OpenSER/SER, without MediaProxy or RTPProxy. You would get some very impressive numbers, unfortunately dropped by the [Media|RTP]proxy presence. Try to review Your configuration, so that You forward to media-aware servers only calls that needed it (with one UA sitting behind a NAT box,p.ex.), not all. It would give a 'little' more headache for design and maintenance, but would permit a higher concurrent call number... ;) Edson. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of unplug > Sent: segunda-feira, 29 de maio de 2006 22:23 > To: Juha Heinanen > Cc: OpenSER-users > Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER dimensioning. How many calls/sec can it set > up? > > You are right that you can have 10 servers installed mediaproxy to > handle 300 concurrent calls. However, it is not a practical way to > implement a system to support several hundred concurrent calls using > several servers. As someone said, openser can handle several hundred > calls, maybe thousand. Comparing to my testing result, I have no idea > the capacity of openser can handle. Anyone can tell me the real > capacity that openser can handle? > > On 5/29/06, Juha Heinanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > unplug writes: > > > > > mediaproxy spends much of the CPU to handle the call compared with > > > rtpproxy. From the result that I made in the load test, the number > of > > > concurrent call is much much less than we expected. > > > maximum concurrent call using mediaproxy (openser & mediaproxy in the > > > same server): 30 > > > maximum concurrent call using rtpproxy (openser & rtpproxy in the > same > > > server): 60 > > > > you can distribute mediaproxy to as many host you want. or are you > > saying that mediaproxy module functions use_mediaproxy/end_mediaproxy > > are the bottleneck? > > > > -- juha > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
