Hello,
On 03/21/07 21:44, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
Hi Daniel.
Some time ago, I tried to compile Openser for 64 bits, but I had
problems with libradiusclient, when It was compiled for 64 bits.
Is that problem solved? Could I run Openser + MySQL + Radius support
compiled as 64 bit?
haven't tried myself, but as I could see, there were several fixes for
libradiusclient on 64b. You should give another try.
Cheers,
Daniel
Kind regards.
Sergio G.
On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hello,
On 03/21/07 20:14, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
>
> I am repeating the test using 6 instances of SIPp, and I am having a
> better performance.
>
> A question. In the page you have listed that the Proxy and UAS
runs on
> a 64 bit machine. Was the compilation done to generate a 64 bit
> executable?
yes, it was 64bit executable. OS is Debian amd64.
Cheers,
Daniel
>
> Thanks.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Sergio Gutierrez
>
> On 3/21/07, *Sergio Gutierrez* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel.
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> My configs are as the same used in published tests, and my
UAS, as
> described is another instance of Openser.
>
> I will try what you sugest.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sergio Gutiérrez.
>
>
> On 3/21/07, *Daniel-Constantin Mierla* <
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> do you use same configs as in published tests? The UAS
is another
> openser with just sending a 200 ok reply or sipp with uas
> scenario?
>
> First check what is the capacity of sipp -- make a very
simple
> config
> with just sl_send_reply("200","ok") in main route and start
> sipp. See
> what results you get and that should be the reference
for sipp
> capacity.
> Also, try to use multiple instances of sipp, from different
> servers, see
> if you get the cumulative value better.
>
> The tests were done on Core2 processor, and parallel
execution of
> openser processes has some impact as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 03/21/07 16:52, Sergio Gutierrez wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Currently I am installing Openser 1.2.0 on a Sun Fire
T2000
> running
> > Solaris 10.
> > Although I used an optimized version of GCC for SPARC
> Systems, and
> > used the recommended settings to generate accurate
code for my
> > Processor (UltraSPARC T1), the results of the performance
> tests are
> > just 50% of the presented ones on the web page.
> >
> > My setup is the following:
> >
> > Proxy and UAS: Sun Fire T2000, 8 GB RAM, 1 UltraSPARC
T1 1.2
> GHZ 6 Core.
> > UAC's: Two domain of a Sun Fire 12K, 4 GB RAM, 4 UlraSPARC
> III+ 900 Mhz
> > Software versions listed as on the webpage.
> >
> > openser -V output:
> > version: openser 1.2.0-notls (sparc/solaris)
> > flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE,
USE_MCAST,
> > SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC,
> FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT-NOSMP
> > ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
> MAX_LISTEN 16,
> > MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
> > poll method support: poll, select, /dev/poll.
> > svnrevision: unknown
> > @(#) $Id: main.c 1827 2007-03-12 15:22:53Z bogdan_iancu $
> > main.c compiled on 21:43:51 Mar 19 2007 with gcc 4.0.3
> >
> >
> > I would thank any idea about how could I improve the
> performnace of my
> > setup. I think that because of the hardware
specifications,
> the result
> > should be at least equal than listed.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Kind regards.
> >
> > Sergio Gutiérrez.
> >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
