On Friday 30 March 2007 11:30, Cesc wrote: > Well, never used cmake myself, so can't tell. Autotools is complicated > if starting from scratch, but if using existing configs from some > other project, the jumpstart is very big.
As long as you don't need to change anything with autotools, and you can stay with your copied configuration, then autotools work fine. I follow the KDE project closely, and they made good experiences with cmake after a long period of autotools problems, http://dot.kde.org/1172083974/ . I look a little bit into this, and it seems ok. > As for the port ... i would expect some difficulties in some parts, > like locking, loging and memory mgmnt ... also some database access > libraries ... but maybe a simple, very cut-down version, with basic > functionality, could be realized ... Do you expect a huge interest in a windows port? Henning _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
