Hi Marcello,

you should try the latest SVN version. The leak visible in your logs is related to pkg mem, for the eval_elem() function (used in script evaluation). There is no other trace for a leak.

This was fixed some time ago, so, just update form SVN and see if the problem persist.

regards,
bogdan

Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi Bogdan,
thank you for following my issue.
I installed it from source non tls.
I just read the Changelog in the 1.2.1 source and found that some memory leak were fixed, but doesn't seems to me that are related to my issue. Anyway was my intention to put up the 1.2.1 version (let me know if is better from source or svn) and look at what will happen. Only before i want to make the debugging to let you be able to identify the problem. As i told in my orevious email i'm almost sure that it is related to the wrong REGISTER packet that i receive from one of my test equipments. I saw that more or less one day and halp after this requests started i got the problem. After the first time it happened again after the same amount of time.
Theoretically it should happen today again.
Let me know if you need any other data to debug the problem.
Thanks,
Bye,
Marcello

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Marcello,

it looks like a mem leak from the script execution (variables related). There were some fixes (about mem leaks) since 1.2.0 release. What version do you use (revision) ? how do you installed 1.2 ? binaries? SVN? source?

regards,
bogdan

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Marcello,

thanks for all your debugging work - i will take a look on the logs and try to see what is the problem.

Regards,
Bogdan

Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi to all,
the problem of memory leak happened again yesterday evening after one day and half. I think the problem is related to the wrong REGISTER message i talked about in my previous message.
I got now the memory allocation debug for each process.
From what i can understand there is some problem in the pkg memory been exausted.

I put the logs at this link.

http://82.193.22.211/memory_allocation_log.tar.bz2 (938945 bytes)

Inside the archive you can found:

1229152 2007-06-10 11:57 process_27550_log.txt
1492973 2007-06-10 11:57 process_27560_log.txt
1169865 2007-06-10 11:57 process_27561_log.txt
1494209 2007-06-10 11:58 process_27564_log.txt
1488361 2007-06-10 11:58 process_27566_log.txt
1488745 2007-06-10 11:59 process_27568_log.txt
1499227 2007-06-10 11:59 process_27570_log.txt
1175089 2007-06-10 12:00 process_27571_log.txt
1175089 2007-06-10 12:00 process_27573_log.txt
1175089 2007-06-10 12:01 process_27575_log.txt
1175089 2007-06-10 12:01 process_27577_log.txt
1175089 2007-06-10 12:02 process_27579_log.txt
1173214 2007-06-10 12:02 process_27581_log.txt
1175450 2007-06-10 12:02 process_27583_log.txt
1175450 2007-06-10 12:03 process_27586_log.txt
1175450 2007-06-10 12:03 process_27587_log.txt
1175450 2007-06-10 12:04 process_27589_log.txt
1175450 2007-06-10 12:04 process_27591_log.txt
1170081 2007-06-10 12:04 process_27593_log.txt

Each file contain the memory allocation log of the named process on the restart of the proxy.

I used some grep on the process 27560 log and found that on 4165 occurrence of the alloc term the most are used from:

# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |wc
 4165   37485  476890
# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |grep route_struct |wc
  1193   10737  139052
# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |grep cfg.lex |wc
   915    8235   98820
# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |grep route.c|wc
   896    8064  100334
# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |grep items.c|wc
   651    5859   76818
# grep alloc process_27560_log.txt |grep avpops_parse|wc
   245    2205   30923

All the rest have very few utilizations.
As i explained before i'm not a coder so if someone can help me it will very helpfull.
Thanks,
Bye,
Marcello

Marcello Lupo wrote:
Hi to all,
i made some other investigation on my logs.
I found that from one day before the problem of out of memory has been
raised in my logs i found this wrong registrations started to come to
the proxy every 15 seconds from one client.

REGISTER sip:voip.domain.com:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 123.123.123.123:1375;branch=z9hG4bK00E0F55649500000BF2F00001098
From: <sip:voip.domain.com>;tag=00E0F55649500000BF2F00001AB7
To: <sip:voip.domain.com>
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 59185 REGISTER
Contact: <sip:123.123.123.123:5060>
Expires: 3600
Max-Forwards: 70
Content-Length:     0

In my configuration as route that handle REGISTER requests i made an avp_db_load to check if the username registering is a valid user and make some avp_check on the preferences that are loaded.

Is it possible that having the empty username in From/To is causing some memory leak?
Remember i'm using version 1.2.0 .
Thanks,
Bye,
Marcello








_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to