On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 12:54 +0200, Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > Roman Haefeli <[email protected]> > writes: > > > [...] > > > We have a HA cluster with corosync/pacemaker running, which manages the > > CTs which are running on an NFS export shared across all nodes. As the > > HA layer makes sure to not run duplicate instances of CTs, there seems > > to be no reason to have NFS locking enabled. > > How do you do STONITH in openvz? I hope you are doing it, because > thats the only thing that prevents corruption in the split brain > situations,
We use SBD (Storage Based Death) > now that you've turned off locking (i.e. fencing). Turning on locking wouldn't prevent data corruption in case of a split brain situation as for most files no lock is acquired. Roman _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
