Agreed Paulo, virsh always seemed to me a sort of least common denominator, a dumbed down and reduced capability replacement for the virtuozzo tools we all know and love.
Jake On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:58 PM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT <pauloco...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jake, > > Thank you for your valuable feedback! Let's see what the Virtuozzo dev > team has to say about this issue with the GPG key for the "prlctl" tools. > > By the way, last time I tried virsh with OpenVZ (version 8, at the time of > test), the experience was not good nor well documented as prlctl. But we > are already receiving the warning about prlctl being deprecated. > > There are some niche cases in which virsh doesn't seem capable, like > setting "cpulimit". > > > Paulo Coghi > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 9:24 PM jjs - mainphrame <j...@mainphrame.com> > wrote: > >> Everything was looking good, and I was considering installing ovz 9 on a >> physical server, but I ran into a weird issue with the GPG keys when I >> tried to install prlctl: >> >> GPG key at file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9 (0x463278F2) >> is already installed >> The GPG keys listed for the "OpenVZ" repository are already installed but >> they are not correct for this package. >> Check that the correct key URLs are configured for this repository.. >> Failing package is: prlctl-9.0.2-1.vz9.x86_64 >> GPG Keys are configured as: >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-Virtuozzo-9 >> The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful >> transaction. >> You can remove cached packages by executing 'yum clean packages'. >> Error: GPG check FAILED >> >> Jake >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 9:21 AM jjs - mainphrame <j...@mainphrame.com> >> wrote: >> >>> The iso is indeed a new image. >>> >>> I've installed it in a VM and have been poking around, looks promising >>> so far, creating a few containers and taking them for a spin. >>> >>> Jake >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:21 PM jjs - mainphrame <j...@mainphrame.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Downloading, will investigate. >>>> >>>> Jake >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 4:11 PM Paulo Coghi - Coghi IT < >>>> pauloco...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> What about this one, dated 27-Jan-2023? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/factory9/x86_64/iso/openvz-iso-9.0.1-383.iso >>>>> >>>>> Paulo Coghi >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:07 PM jjs - mainphrame <j...@mainphrame.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I downloaded the vz9.iso and mounted it, and all the files are dated >>>>>> Feb 2 2022. >>>>>> >>>>>> So, no joy, despite the deceptive Dec 2022 date on the iso. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jake >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 7:38 AM jehan Procaccia < >>>>>> jehan.procac...@imtbs-tsp.eu> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> actually I wonder if openvz-iso-9: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/9.0/x86_64/iso/ >>>>>>> <https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/9.0/x86_64/iso/>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *openvz-iso-9.0.0.iso 24-Feb-2022 04:41 2.9G* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> which is supposed to be the base reference for virtuozzo 9 , >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is the same as >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://repo.virtuozzo.com/vz/releases/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *vz9.iso 20-Dec-2022 12:31 2G* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> please let us know which .iso we should start with to test vz9 (open >>>>>>> version) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> why haven't they the same date (Feb 2022 vs Dec 2022) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks . >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list >>>>> Users@openvz.org >>>>> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@openvz.org >> https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@openvz.org > https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openvz.org https://lists.openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users