> Subject: Re: [Users] Using virsh on the node
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:25:55 +0200
> From: Itamar Heim <[email protected]>
> To: Dan Yasny <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]
> 
> On 02/27/2012 06:34 PM, Dan Yasny wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Nathan Stratton"<[email protected]>
>>> To: "Dan Yasny"<[email protected]>
>>> Cc: [email protected], "Andrew Cathrow"<[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Monday, 27 February, 2012 4:13:54 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [Users] Using virsh on the node
>>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Dan Yasny wrote:
>>>
>>>> So the engine is a VM in that same cluster, along with the VMs it
>>>> manages?
>>>
>>> Yes, the only thing I have not been able to figure out is how to let
>>> the
>>> ovirt-engine know that ovirt-engine is running. :) I thought that it
>>> would
>>> see via libvirt, but it does not. I also tried setting it in the db,
>>> but
>>> it keeps getting cleared. Any idea on how to let ovirt-engine know
>>> that a
>>> host has been started manually?
>>
>> Seriously, not a good idea. The Engine is supposed to be looking at the 
>> setup, and not be in the setup, where it may be affected by the problems 
>> that  might occur to the setup.
>> I'm pretty sure there's lots of though being devoted to removing this 
>> limitation, but when we say it's a bad idea, it really is, it's not like we 
>> simply want you to run an extra machine
> 
> Doron - this reminds me of the all-in-one discussion. what was the
> resolution on flagging the node as a node running an engine VM (even
> without engine knowing about its own VM)
> 
Sorry for breaking the thread, technical issues.
Currently we handle standard platforms (ie- not the node),
by using the all-in-one rpm which is currently in work.
So when you add a host via the REST you may specify not
to reboot it, and you should not specify power-management
from properties, which will make sure fencing will not occur.

Other than that there's no specific awareness to the host
being an angine-core host.

>>
>>>
>>>> What do you use for storage?
>>>
>>
>> That's easier than block storage, but still, what happens if the host where 
>> the engine was running failed - who would update VM statuses and restart the 
>> HA VMs?
>>
>>> NFS:
>>>
>>> mount 10.13.0.4:/images/ /rhev/data-center/mnt/10.13.0.4:_images
>>> mount 10.13.0.4:/iso/ /rhev/data-center/mnt/10.13.0.4:_iso
>>>
>>>> Dan Yasny
>>>> Red Hat Israel
>>>> +972 9769 2280
>>>
>>>> <>
>>> Nathan Stratton                                CTO, BlinkMind, Inc.
>>> nathan at robotics.net                         nathan at
>>> blinkmind.com
>>> http://www.robotics.net
>>>                         http://www.blinkmind.com
>>>


-- 

/d

"All computers wait at the same speed."
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to