On 11/27/2012 09:56 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
27 nov 2012 kl. 15.42 skrev Itamar Heim:
On 11/27/2012 08:28 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
Hey all!
Since recently patching our hosts, I´ve been having trouble running FreeBSD
guests with more than one virtual core or socket. I have managed take a
screenshot of how it looks like when it panics when booting kernel, right after
ACPI:
http://i47.tinypic.com/2u90qrr.png
I´ve tried this with similar results using 8.2-RELEASE, 8.3-RELEASE,
9.0-RELEASE and 9-STABLE.
If I edit the guest to have only one virtual core or socket, it boots up
without issue.
Since noticing this, I´ve tried updating the packages one more time, thinking
maybe it had already been fixed but no, it remains. These are the package
versions I´m using:
# rpm -qa | egrep '(kernel|libvirt|qemu|vdsm|seabios)' | sort -d
ipxe-roms-qemu-20120328-1.gitaac9718.fc17.noarch
kernel-3.6.2-4.fc17.x86_64
kernel-3.6.3-1.fc17.x86_64
kernel-3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 << This is the one that´s running
libvirt-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
qemu-common-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-img-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-tools-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
seabios-1.7.1-1.fc17.x86_64
seabios-bin-1.7.1-1.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
Do you have any insights as to what the problem might be?
Best Regards
Karli Sjöberg
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
the first suspect would be qemu-kvm and maybe the bios, can you please
downgrade it to the previously
Oh the fun of downgrading...pass:) But it just so happens that we have another
ovirt system running, apart from the production system, that may be less
patched. I´ll check and see if there´s any difference there. Is there any data
you wish me to share, like logs or something while testing? Or just yay/nay?
if we identify the offending package, and versions, easier to report the
regression and ask to fix it
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
