On 11/29/2012 01:52 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
28 nov 2012 kl. 17.07 skrev Itamar Heim:
On 11/28/2012 08:39 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
28 nov 2012 kl. 09.19 skrev Itamar Heim:
On 11/28/2012 01:52 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
27 nov 2012 kl. 16.01 skrev :
27 nov 2012 kl. 15.59 skrev Itamar Heim:
On 11/27/2012 09:56 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
27 nov 2012 kl. 15.42 skrev Itamar Heim:
On 11/27/2012 08:28 AM, Karli Sjöberg wrote:
Hey all!
Since recently patching our hosts, I´ve been having trouble running FreeBSD
guests with more than one virtual core or socket. I have managed take a
screenshot of how it looks like when it panics when booting kernel, right after
ACPI:
http://i47.tinypic.com/2u90qrr.png
I´ve tried this with similar results using 8.2-RELEASE, 8.3-RELEASE,
9.0-RELEASE and 9-STABLE.
If I edit the guest to have only one virtual core or socket, it boots up
without issue.
Since noticing this, I´ve tried updating the packages one more time, thinking
maybe it had already been fixed but no, it remains. These are the package
versions I´m using:
# rpm -qa | egrep '(kernel|libvirt|qemu|vdsm|seabios)' | sort -d
ipxe-roms-qemu-20120328-1.gitaac9718.fc17.noarch
kernel-3.6.2-4.fc17.x86_64
kernel-3.6.3-1.fc17.x86_64
kernel-3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64 << This is the one that´s running
libvirt-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
qemu-common-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-img-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-tools-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
seabios-1.7.1-1.fc17.x86_64
seabios-bin-1.7.1-1.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
Do you have any insights as to what the problem might be?
Best Regards
Karli Sjöberg
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
the first suspect would be qemu-kvm and maybe the bios, can you please
downgrade it to the previously
Oh the fun of downgrading...pass:) But it just so happens that we have another
ovirt system running, apart from the production system, that may be less
patched. I´ll check and see if there´s any difference there. Is there any data
you wish me to share, like logs or something while testing? Or just yay/nay?
if we identify the offending package, and versions, easier to report the
regression and ask to fix it
So yay/nay it is! Thanks.
I´ve now tested to create a new FreeBSD server with dual cores in our
experiment/test system and it worked, no problemo.
oVirt test system - good:
ipxe-roms-qemu-20120328-1.gitaac9718.fc17.noarch
kernel-3.3.4-5.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.9.11.6-1.fc17.x86_64
qemu-common-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-img-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-tools-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
seabios-1.7.0-1.fc17.x86_64
seabios-bin-1.7.0-1.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
oVirt prod system - bad:
ipxe-roms-qemu-20120328-1.gitaac9718.fc17.noarch
kernel-3.6.7-4.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-client-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-network-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.9.11.7-1.fc17.x86_64
qemu-common-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-img-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-kvm-tools-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
qemu-system-x86-1.0.1-2.fc17.x86_64
seabios-1.7.1-1.fc17.x86_64
seabios-bin-1.7.1-1.fc17.noarch
vdsm-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-cli-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
vdsm-python-4.10.0-10.fc17.x86_64
vdsm-xmlrpc-4.10.0-10.fc17.noarch
so seems like you have different:
kernel
seabios
libvirt
can you please upgrade them one by one to find the culprit (I'd do in this
order for simplicity of rollback: seabios, libvirt, kernel)
Done. Kernel is the culprit!
We have two hosts in the test system, so what I did was to first update
seabios; test, then update libvirt; test, kernel; test on host1, where all was
well until after booting new kernel. So I wanted to know for sure that it was
only the kernel's blame, so on host2 only kernel was updated and afterwards the
issue started appearing. So definitely, kernel.
PS. As I expected, downgrading the packages again failed horribly. I friggin'
hate trying to downgrade, even for just a few packages, I opt-out and rather
just reinstall the whole thing to save me the headache:)
please open a bug on fedora kernel, and paste here. thanks
well, i guess next question is does fedora 18 kernel solves the issue...
Done! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881579
thanks.
dor/karen - is there anyone who can take a look at this fedora
regression causing SMP vm's to panic with a kernel upgrade?
thanks,
Itamar
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
