On 04/16/2013 12:21 AM, Alex Leonhardt wrote: > Thanks Martin, > > I tested on a "almost" empty host I had to play with, and it seemed all > went well, so will hopefully be able to regain ~11 GB of memory after > restarting libvirtd :) .. > > I'll sign up to the other mailing list to find out why / how it could > have grown this big :\ >
There might be some memleaks, especially in older version. For this kind of stuff, I'd maybe use the libvir-list [1] Martin [1] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > Thanks > Alex > > > On 04/15/2013 04:12 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> On 04/15/2013 03:39 PM, Alex Leonhardt wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I believe it's save, but just wanted to re-check, is it save to restart >>> libvirtd on a HV running ~40 VMs ? >>> >> Hi, >> >> for libvirt questions, I'd rather use [email protected], but for >> this particular one, I can confirm that libvirt is written in a way that >> enables it to be restarted without any impact on the machines which are >> being ran. >> >> Of course I can't say "nothing will happen" due to the fact that every >> single time something can happen, but nothing _should_ happen to any of >> your machines. >> >> Have a nice day, >> Martin > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
