On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 07:50:50PM -0400, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Tomasz Torcz" <[email protected]> > > To: "Antoni Segura Puimedon" <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 5:19:04 PM > > Subject: Re: [Users] libteam network devices support in ovirt > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 03:34:03PM +0100, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:24 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Little over a year ago Fedora introduced alternative bonding driver > > > > for network devices - libteam: https://fedorahosted.org/libteam/ > > > > Can we expect libteam support in ovirt at the same level as for "bond" > > > > driver? Currently, libteam bonded interfaces are not visible in > > > > "Setup Host Networks" dialog. > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > We are aware of libteam bonds and I personally look forward to them very > > > much. > > > > > > The ideal way to support them would be via one new network configurator > > > that > > > would implicitly make teamd bonds instead of usual bonds. After the > > > iproute2 > > > configurator is finished (it is currently in progress but quite > > > functional) > > > it > > > should be quite easy to inherit from vdsm/netconf/iproute2.py and modify > > > configureBond, removeBond and editBondings so that they make use of teamd > > > bonds. > > > > What needs to be done to get ”minimal” support? By minimal I understand > > oVirt acknowledging that network interfaces are teamed. Configuring teams > > from oVirt can come later. Right now teamed interfaces are displayed > > as separate in net configuration dialog, and master team device is not > > displayed at all. I could live with manually configure teams if only > > I can attach them to ovirt networks. > > would that be a bridged or a bridgeless network? A vlanned or non-vlanned > network?
I'm not entirely sure if you honestly asking or just trying to make me realize how many variables are involved in such support. I will assume the former. I have team0 interface of two physical NICs. I'd like to have this team0 interface attached to particular VM. That would mean bridged network I suppose. There are no VLANs in my setup. To be clear, I am able to tear down this setup and revert to old-school bond. I'd prefer not to – it needs some downtime to reconfigure and validate. So now I'm against the question: what will require more work from me, reconfiguring network or making ovirt recognize basic team0. -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. xmpp: [email protected] -- Baron Vladimir Harkonnen _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
