----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> > To: d...@redhat.com > Cc: "Maurice James" <midnightst...@msn.com>, "Ofer Blaut" > <obl...@redhat.com>, users@ovirt.org, "Michal Skrivanek" > <mskri...@redhat.com>, "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:15:24 AM > Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dafna Ron" <d...@redhat.com> > > To: "Maurice James" <midnightst...@msn.com> > > Cc: "Ofer Blaut" <obl...@redhat.com>, users@ovirt.org > > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 7:34:11 PM > > Subject: Re: [Users] Disk Migration > > > > On 02/26/2014 05:24 PM, Maurice James wrote: > > > I have a specific interface set up for migrations. Why do disk > > > migrations not use the interface that I have set for migrations? Is > > > that by design? Shouldnt it use the interfaces that I have set aside > > > for migrations? VM migrations work as they should but not disk migrations > > > > I don't think that you can configure interface for disk migration. > > Disk migration is actually copy of information from the original disk to > > a new disk created on a new domain + delete of the original disk once > > that is done. > > it's not actually a migration and so I am not sure you can actually > > configure an interface for that. > > adding ofer - perhpas he has a solution or it's possible and I am not > > aware of it. > > I guess that *not* using the migration network for storage operation is > the expected behavior, to make migration faster and safer.
This seems to be the only documentation for the migration network: www.ovirt.org/Features/Migration_Network And it seems that it works as intended. Nir _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
