----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gilad Chaplik" <[email protected]> > To: "Nathanaël Blanchet" <[email protected]> > Cc: "users" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 11:52:10 AM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SLA : RAM scheduling > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gilad Chaplik" <[email protected]> > > To: "Nathanaël Blanchet" <[email protected]> > > Cc: "Karli Sjöberg" <[email protected]>, "users" <[email protected]> > > Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2014 11:49:48 AM > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SLA : RAM scheduling > > > > Hi Nathanaël, > > > > You have 2 ways to get what you're after (quick/slow): > > 1) install 'oVirt's external scheduling proxy', and write an extremely > > simple > > weight function that orders hosts by used memory, then add that to your > > cluster policy. > > 2) open an RFE for oVirt 3.4 to have that in > > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=oVirt). > > by 3.4, I mean 3.4.x (= anyway for (2) you'll need to upgrade), but not sure > it will make it. > > > > > let me know if you consider (1), and I'll assist. > > > > anyway I suggest you'll open an RFE for 3.5. > > > > Thanks, > > Gilad. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Nathanaël Blanchet" <[email protected]> > > > To: "Karli Sjöberg" <[email protected]> > > > Cc: "users" <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 7:38:40 PM > > > Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] SLA : RAM scheduling > > > > > > even distribution is for cpu only > > > > > > Le 23/05/2014 17:48, Karli Sjöberg a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Den 23 maj 2014 17:13 skrev =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nathana=EBl_Blanchet?= > > > <[email protected]> : > > > > > > > > > > > > Le 23/05/2014 17:11, Nathanaël Blanchet a écrit : > > > > > Hello, > > > > > On ovirt 3.4, is it possible to schedule vms distribution depending > > > > > on > > > > > host RAM availibility? > > > > > Concretly, I had to manually move vms all the vms to the second host > > > > > of the cluster, this lead to reach 90% occupation of memory on the > > > > > destination host. When my first host has rebooted, none vms of the > > > > > second host automatically migrated to the first one which had full > > > > > RAM. How to make this happen? > > > > > > > > > ... so as to both hosts be RAM evenly distributed... hope to be enough > > > > clear... > > > > > > Sounds like you just want to apply the cluster policy for even > > > distribution. > > > Have you assigned any policy for that cluster? > > > > > > /K > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Nathanaël Blanchet > > > > > > > > Supervision réseau > > > > Pôle exploitation et maintenance > > > > Département des systèmes d'information > > > > 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala > > > > 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5 > > > > Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55 > > > > Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14 > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Users mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > -- > > > Nathanaël Blanchet > > > > > > Supervision réseau > > > Pôle exploitation et maintenance > > > Département des systèmes d'information > > > 227 avenue Professeur-Jean-Louis-Viala > > > 34193 MONTPELLIER CEDEX 5 > > > Tél. 33 (0)4 67 54 84 55 > > > Fax 33 (0)4 67 54 84 14 [email protected] > > >
Sounds like this RFE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093038 FWIW, you can implement your own logic in Python until we get to implement the above RFE. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
