On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 6:11 PM, Christophe TREFOIS < christophe.tref...@uni.lu> wrote:
> Hi Yaniv, > > In the best case everything, I would like to replace the 1G with 10G. > The reason is that both NICs are on the same subnet, which would create > problems then with both active? > Linux isn't very happy when two NICs are on the same subnet, AFAIK, so indeed, I would not recommend it. > > My guess is the RX errors are due to the missing gateway? > No, those are Ethernet level issues. > > Currently I can’t reach the p4p1 NIC since the gateway goes through the 1G > NIC. > Makes sense. If possible, I'd change this (routing-wise) and just reinstall the host from the oVirt management. That would be the simplest approach. (but again, I'd do it only after making sure the network is error free). Y. > Cheers, > > Dr Christophe Trefois, Dipl.-Ing. > Technical Specialist / Post-Doc > > UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG > > LUXEMBOURG CENTRE FOR SYSTEMS BIOMEDICINE > Campus Belval | House of Biomedicine > 6, avenue du Swing > L-4367 Belvaux > T: +352 46 66 44 6124 > F: +352 46 66 44 6949 > http://www.uni.lu/lcsb > > [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/trefex> [image: Twitter] > <https://twitter.com/Trefex> [image: Google Plus] > <https://plus.google.com/+ChristopheTrefois/> [image: Linkedin] > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/trefoischristophe> [image: skype] > <http://skype:Trefex?call> > > ---- > This message is confidential and may contain privileged information. > It is intended for the named recipient only. > If you receive it in error please notify me and permanently delete the > original message and any copies. > ---- > > > On 10 Jan 2016, at 16:42, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Christophe TREFOIS < > christophe.tref...@uni.lu> wrote: > >> p4p1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> inet 10.79.2.254 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 10.79.255.255 >> inet6 fe80::a236:9fff:fe16:b68c prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20<link> >> ether a0:36:9f:16:b6:8c txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) >> RX packets 2901163 bytes 2803302669 (2.6 GiB) >> RX errors 35242 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 35242 >> > > Before you move, I suggest to look at the errors that you have here. On > the 1G you have transferred far more data without errors. > > What would you like to move to the 10g? The storage, migration, VM > networks? > Y. > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users