Thanks for the response. If possible i would like to reduce the amount of tooling. We already have quite a lot. Do you think a single ovirt engine could cope?
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 26 apr. 2016 om 14:19 heeft Alexander Wels <aw...@redhat.com> het volgende > geschreven: > >> On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:13:11 PM jo...@familiealbers.nl wrote: >> Hi all, i have a somewhat awkward requirement to deploy datacenters to >> around 500 satelite locations. Each datacenter will have 1 or 2 hypervisors >> and if 2 a cluster with glusterfs for shared storage will be deployed. I am >> expecting to run between 4 and 10 vms per data center. During operations >> it is expected 20% to 40% of the satelite locations will be down or have a >> very bad connection to the engine. I will still like to manage these >> datacenters from ovirt engine. Does anyone have any figures on how many >> datacenters i can add given what requirements for a single engine and >> perhaps some best practices for dealing with 'bad' connections between the >> hypervisors and the engine. Thanks a lot! > > Sounds like a good use case for manage IQ. If possible I would do hosted > engines in each satellite location, and then use manage IQ to manage the > engines. > > Alexander > > ps. > Vrolijk Koning dag morgen > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
