As addition: I get the same result using mode=4, only when I use multiple VLANS on the interface.
2016-07-13 15:58 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>: > Hi Pavel, > > Thanks for your update. I also saw that the post are both online but I > thought the second nic only advertises the mac so the switch does not > get confused. > > The issue might be that i do VRRP, so the bond is connected to two > switches, they are not stacked, only trunked as that's what VRRP > requires and works well on the side where there is only one VLAN on > the Host interface. > > It just goes wrong on multiple vlans. > > This is what I see everywhere. > > Mode 1 (active-backup) > This mode places one of the interfaces into a backup state and will > only make it active if the link is lost by the active interface. Only > one slave in the bond is active at an instance of time. A different > slave becomes active only when the active slave fails. This mode > provides fault tolerance. > > It's sure I need to get my traffic back on my sending port, so that is > why the arp for the passive port was there I thought. > > Are there other modes that should be working on VRRP in your understanding ? > > Thanks a lot, > > Matt > > > > 2016-07-13 15:43 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>: >> In mode=1 the active interface sends traffic, but both interfaces accept >> incoming traffic. Hardware switches send broadcast/multicast/unknown >> destination MACs to all ports, including the passive interface. So packet >> sent from the active interface can be received back from the passive >> interface. FreeBSD CARP just would go mad when it receives its own packets. >> >> I believe if you get Linux implementation, it will work well in the same >> network setup. I use keepalived in oVirt VMs with bonded network, and have >> no issues. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com> >> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 15:54 >> To: Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>, users <users@ovirt.org> >> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >> >> How can it lead into packet duplication when the passive should not be >> active and only it's mac-address should be visible on the switch to >> prevent confusion on the switch ? >> >> For a VRRP setup on the switch there is no other option then mode=1 as >> far as I know ? >> >> 2016-07-13 14:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>: >>> I would say that bonding breaks CARP somehow. In example mode=1 can lead to >>> packet duplication, so pfsense can receive it's own packets. Try firewall >>> in pfsense all incomming packets that have the same source MAC address as >>> pfsense. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com> >>> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 15:29 >>> To: Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com> >>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >>> >>> Hi Pavel, >>> >>> No it's Pfsense, so FreeBSD. >>> >>> Is there something different there ? >>> >>> >>> >>> 2016-07-13 13:59 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>: >>>> Matt, >>>> >>>> How is CARP implemented? Is it OpenBSD? >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: <users-boun...@ovirt.org> on behalf of "Matt ." >>>> <yamakasi....@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 12:42 >>>> Cc: users <users@ovirt.org> >>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >>>> >>>> Hi Pavel, >>>> >>>> This is done and used without the Bond before. >>>> >>>> Now I applied a bond it goes wrong and I'm searching but can't find a >>>> thing about it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2016-07-13 11:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>: >>>>> Matt, >>>>> >>>>> In order to use CARP/VRRP in a VM you have to disable MAC spoofing >>>>> prevention. >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/032839.html >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: <users-boun...@ovirt.org> on behalf of "Matt ." >>>>> <yamakasi....@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Tuesday 12 July 2016 at 21:58 >>>>> To: users <users@ovirt.org> >>>>> Subject: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1 >>>>> >>>>> Hi guys, >>>>> >>>>> I have been testing bonding with a vm connected to the network on this >>>>> bond mode=1 (vlans on top of it) where the vm uses a carp IP for >>>>> failover. >>>>> >>>>> It seems that when the VM which holds the Carp IP and so is Master you >>>>> can ping both IP's, so interface IP and Carp IP, but you cannot >>>>> throw/route any traffic over it. >>>>> >>>>> You can route traffic over the interface IP of the Carp Slave. >>>>> >>>>> Is this known or just not possible ? >>>>> >>>>> I hope it's a "bug" :) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Users mailing list >>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users