As addition: I get the same result using mode=4, only when I use
multiple VLANS on the interface.

2016-07-13 15:58 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> Thanks for your update. I also saw that the post are both online but I
> thought the second nic only advertises the mac so the switch does not
> get confused.
>
> The issue might be that i do VRRP, so the bond is connected to two
> switches, they are not stacked, only trunked as that's what VRRP
> requires and works well on the side where there is only one VLAN on
> the Host interface.
>
> It just goes wrong on multiple vlans.
>
> This is what I see everywhere.
>
> Mode 1 (active-backup)
> This mode places one of the interfaces into a backup state and will
> only make it active if the link is lost by the active interface. Only
> one slave in the bond is active at an instance of time. A different
> slave becomes active only when the active slave fails. This mode
> provides fault tolerance.
>
> It's sure I need to get my traffic back on my sending port, so that is
> why the arp for the passive port was there I thought.
>
> Are there other modes that should be working on VRRP in your understanding ?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> 2016-07-13 15:43 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>:
>> In mode=1 the active interface sends traffic, but both interfaces accept 
>> incoming traffic. Hardware switches send broadcast/multicast/unknown 
>> destination MACs to all ports, including the passive interface. So packet 
>> sent from the active interface can be received back from the passive 
>> interface. FreeBSD CARP just would go mad when it receives its own packets.
>>
>> I believe if you get Linux implementation, it will work well in the same 
>> network setup. I use keepalived in oVirt VMs with bonded network, and have 
>> no issues.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 15:54
>> To: Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>, users <users@ovirt.org>
>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1
>>
>> How can it lead into packet duplication when the passive should not be
>> active and only it's mac-address should be visible on the switch to
>> prevent confusion on the switch ?
>>
>> For a VRRP setup on the switch there is no other option then mode=1 as
>> far as I know ?
>>
>> 2016-07-13 14:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>:
>>> I would say that bonding breaks CARP somehow. In example mode=1 can lead to 
>>> packet duplication, so pfsense can receive it's own packets. Try firewall 
>>> in pfsense all incomming packets that have the same source MAC address as 
>>> pfsense.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 15:29
>>> To: Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1
>>>
>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>
>>> No it's Pfsense, so FreeBSD.
>>>
>>> Is there something different there ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-07-13 13:59 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>:
>>>> Matt,
>>>>
>>>> How is CARP implemented? Is it OpenBSD?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: <users-boun...@ovirt.org> on behalf of "Matt ." 
>>>> <yamakasi....@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Wednesday 13 July 2016 at 12:42
>>>> Cc: users <users@ovirt.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1
>>>>
>>>> Hi Pavel,
>>>>
>>>> This is done and used without the Bond before.
>>>>
>>>> Now I applied a bond it goes wrong and I'm searching but can't find a
>>>> thing about it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-07-13 11:03 GMT+02:00 Pavel Gashev <p...@acronis.com>:
>>>>> Matt,
>>>>>
>>>>> In order to use CARP/VRRP in a VM you have to disable MAC spoofing 
>>>>> prevention.
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2015-May/032839.html
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: <users-boun...@ovirt.org> on behalf of "Matt ." 
>>>>> <yamakasi....@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday 12 July 2016 at 21:58
>>>>> To: users <users@ovirt.org>
>>>>> Subject: [ovirt-users] CARP Fails on Bond mode=1
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been testing bonding with a vm connected to the network on this
>>>>> bond mode=1 (vlans on top of it) where the vm uses a carp IP for
>>>>> failover.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems that when the VM which holds the Carp IP and so is Master you
>>>>> can ping both IP's, so interface IP and Carp IP, but you cannot
>>>>> throw/route any traffic over it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can route traffic over the interface IP of the Carp Slave.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this known or just not possible ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope it's a "bug" :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Users mailing list
>>>>> Users@ovirt.org
>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users@ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to