On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 2:18 PM, Michal Skrivanek <mskri...@redhat.com>
wrote:

>
>
> >
> > Not sure why it is proposed just now and not before.
> > The -lxc package is not used by oVirt, so it will just sit there.
> > The libvirt-daemon-config-network package should be harmless, it just
> contains
> > the configuration fir libvirt's default bridge ‘virbr0'
>
> well, harmless….though for a good reason we stopped pulling in “libvirt”
> as the metapackage brings problematic deps in certain cases (iirc it was
> due to ppc64le)
> That’s why we depend on exactly just
> libvirt-daemon-config-nwfilter libvirt-daemon-kvm libvirt-lock-sanlock
> libvirt-client libvirt-python
>
> As Francesco says it’s mostly harmless, it’s just that on a truly clean
> environment “libvirt” wouldn’t be installed
>
> Thanks,
> michal
>
>
>
Ok, and indeed in my system is not installed... so the question is why
inside the web admin gui there is a complaint about libvirt missing if not
needed:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mveWNDNWpZdjIwV0U/view?usp=sharing
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to