On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What's SBA? > split brain avoidance mechanism > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:05 AM Dan Yasny <dya...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Apr 16, 2017 7:01 AM, "Nir Soffer" <nsof...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:17 AM Dan Yasny <dya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> When you set up a storage domain, you need to specify a host to perform >>> the initial storage operations, but once the SD is defined, it's details >>> are in the engine database, and all the hosts get connected to it directly. >>> If the first host you used to define the SD goes down, all other hosts will >>> still remain connected and work. SPM is an HA service, and if the current >>> SPM host goes down, SPM gets started on another host in the DC. In short, >>> unless your actual NFS exporting host goes down, there is no outage. >>> >> >> There is no storage outage, but if you shutdown the spm host, the spm host >> will not move to a new host until the spm host is online again, or you >> confirm >> manually that the spm host was rebooted. >> >> >> In a properly configured setup the SBA should take care of that. That's >> the whole point of HA services >> >> >> Nir >> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Konstantin Raskoshnyi < >>> konra...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Fernando, >>>> I see each host has direct connection nfs mount, but yes, if main host >>>> to which I connected nfs storage going down the storage becomes unavailable >>>> and all vms are down >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:37 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI < >>>> fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello Konstantin. >>>>> >>>>> That doesn`t make much sense make a whole cluster depend on a single >>>>> host. From what I know any host talk directly to NFS Storage Array or >>>>> whatever other Shared Storage you have. >>>>> Have you tested that host going down if that affects the other with >>>>> the NFS mounted directlly in a NFS Storage array ? >>>>> >>>>> Fernando >>>>> >>>>> 2017-04-15 12:42 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konra...@gmail.com>: >>>>> >>>>>> In ovirt you have to attach storage through specific host. >>>>>> If host goes down storage is not available. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM FERNANDO FREDIANI < >>>>>> fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, make it not go through host1 and dedicate a storage server for >>>>>>> running NFS and make both hosts connect to it. >>>>>>> In my view NFS is much easier to manage than any other type of >>>>>>> storage, specially FC and iSCSI and performance is pretty much the >>>>>>> same, so >>>>>>> you won`t get better results other than management going to other type. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Fernando >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2017-04-15 5:25 GMT-03:00 Konstantin Raskoshnyi <konra...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>>> I have one nfs storage, >>>>>>>> it's connected through host1. >>>>>>>> host2 also has access to it, I can easily migrate vms between them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The question is - if host1 is down - all infrastructure is down, >>>>>>>> since all traffic goes through host1, >>>>>>>> is there any way in oVirt to use redundant storage? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only glusterfs? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Users mailing list >>>>>>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>>>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> Users@ovirt.org >>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users@ovirt.org >>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@ovirt.org >> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users