mmm, perhaps one more reason to go to simple replica 3...

Thanx,
Alex

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Sahina Bose <sab...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Alex K <rightkickt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In the replica 3 + 1 arbiter does this mean that if I loose the two nodes
>> having the normal volumes and left only with the node that has the arbiter
>> volume, I loose all data?
>>
>
> Yes!
>
>
>>
>> Thanx,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Kasturi Narra <kna...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ,
>>>
>>>    yes, you are right. Since arbiter brick  has only metadata and  data
>>> for the vm has to be served from one of the other two replicas, read is
>>> slow.
>>>
>>>     Arbiter is a special subset of replica 3 volumes and is aimed at
>>> preventing split-brains and providing same consistency as a normal replica
>>> 3 volume with out consuming 3x space. You could use replica 3 and no issues
>>> with that.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> kasturi
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Abi Askushi <rightkickt...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I see in the ovirt guides that a gluster volume replica 3 with 1
>>>> arbiter is recommended.
>>>> Why not simple replica 3? Is it due to the higher replication data that
>>>> would cause performance issues?
>>>>
>>>> What I am observing is that a VM running on the server which has the
>>>> arbiter brick has slower read performance then when the same VM runs on
>>>> another server with a normal brick. Has anyone observed this? Is it because
>>>> the arbiter does not have the real data on it?
>>>>
>>>> Thanx,
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Users mailing list
>>>> Users@ovirt.org
>>>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@ovirt.org
>> http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to