On 3/27/20 11:01 AM, Christian Reiss wrote:
> Hey Strahil,
>
> as always: thanks!
>
> On 24/03/2020 12:23, Strahil Nikolov wrote:
>
>> performance.write-behind-window-size: 64MB (shard size)
>
> This one doubled my speed from 200mb to 400mb!!
>
> I think this is where the meat is at.
>
> -Chris.
Won't this increase the risk of data loss? We have everything on dual
power feeds etc, so the risk of the having all or 2/3's of the gluster
nodes fail at the same time is very minimal.
But still when that happens? And with a shard size of 512MB this would
be performance.write-behind-window-size: 512MB?
Always tweaking ;-)
Met vriendelijke groet, With kind regards,
Jorick Astrego
Netbulae Virtualization Experts
----------------
Tel: 053 20 30 270 i...@netbulae.eu Staalsteden 4-3A
KvK 08198180
Fax: 053 20 30 271 www.netbulae.eu 7547 TA Enschede
BTW NL821234584B01
----------------
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list -- users@ovirt.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@ovirt.org
Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/privacy-policy.html
oVirt Code of Conduct:
https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/
List Archives:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/message/2LCGZG5RP5AYWRYHM3XDFOJY6ZVY7CUL/
