Hi Andreas,

Yes that is correct. The pages of the overlay used to get repeated instead
of just using the first page.

Thanks

Laurent

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am 31.08.2014 02:45, schrieb Laurent Yaish:
>
>  So I looked at the code and it does look like there is no way to do this
>> with the new implementation.
>> Using the -even, -odd or -page options could work for a small document,
>> but
>> we wouldn't be able to overlay a 999 page PDF with a 3 page template.
>>
>> What if we added something like a -useAllOverlayPages parameter (it's a
>> bad
>> name, I know)  that would then populate specificPageOverlayPage with all
>> the pages available from the defaultOverlay and then just do something
>> like:
>>
>> int usePageNum = pageNumber % specificPageOverlayPage.size(); if
>> (useAllOverlayPages && specificPageOverlayPage.containsKey(usePageNum)) {
>> layoutPage = specificPageOverlayPage.get(usePageNum); }
>>
>> in the overlayPage() method.
>>
>> I'd try it, but don't code in Java and it probably would take me a while
>> just to get the thing to compile... :)
>>
> Just for clarification. In your given example you expect to overlay your
> 999 pages pdf with a 3 pages overlay pdf by repeating those 3 pages over
> and over again. Am I right?
>
>  Thoughts?
>>
> Obviously the old implementation provided that feature and the current one
> not. So, if it's needed we should reimplement it. Shouldn't be that hard
> ....
>
>  Thanks
>>
>> Laurent
>>
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
>
>
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Laurent Yaish <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to overlay a 12 page PDF with a 2 page "template".
>>> With the old Overlay implementation it would repeat the template 6 times:
>>> page 1, page 2, page 1...
>>>
>>> I tried several of the options documented, but couldn't get it to work
>>> like it used to.
>>>
>>> Does the new implementation support this?
>>>
>>> I'm only using 1.8.2 because the code appears to be broken in the latest
>>> 1.8.6.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Laurent
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to