Hi,
Am 02.09.2014 18:53, schrieb Laurent Yaish:
Hi Andreas,
Should I create an issue in Jira for this?
Yes, please, good idea.
Thanks
Laurent
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Laurent Yaish <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Andreas,
Yes that is correct. The pages of the overlay used to get repeated instead
of just using the first page.
Thanks
Laurent
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Andreas Lehmkuehler <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
Am 31.08.2014 02:45, schrieb Laurent Yaish:
So I looked at the code and it does look like there is no way to do this
with the new implementation.
Using the -even, -odd or -page options could work for a small document,
but
we wouldn't be able to overlay a 999 page PDF with a 3 page template.
What if we added something like a -useAllOverlayPages parameter (it's a
bad
name, I know) that would then populate specificPageOverlayPage with all
the pages available from the defaultOverlay and then just do something
like:
int usePageNum = pageNumber % specificPageOverlayPage.size(); if
(useAllOverlayPages && specificPageOverlayPage.containsKey(usePageNum))
{
layoutPage = specificPageOverlayPage.get(usePageNum); }
in the overlayPage() method.
I'd try it, but don't code in Java and it probably would take me a while
just to get the thing to compile... :)
Just for clarification. In your given example you expect to overlay your
999 pages pdf with a 3 pages overlay pdf by repeating those 3 pages over
and over again. Am I right?
Thoughts?
Obviously the old implementation provided that feature and the current
one not. So, if it's needed we should reimplement it. Shouldn't be that
hard ....
Thanks
Laurent
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Laurent Yaish <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to overlay a 12 page PDF with a 2 page "template".
With the old Overlay implementation it would repeat the template 6
times:
page 1, page 2, page 1...
I tried several of the options documented, but couldn't get it to work
like it used to.
Does the new implementation support this?
I'm only using 1.8.2 because the code appears to be broken in the latest
1.8.6.
Thanks
Laurent
